Approaching Television as New Media – Mike Proulx’s Spotlight on IMS

In the traditional sense of the word, a television is simply a device that allows you to consume images from your home.   It’s one-way communication, with broadcast networks sending signals across vast distances using massive towers to reach TV sets in millions of consumers’ homes.  TV shows are broadcast, and viewers take them in from the couch.

But that old-school vision of TV has shifted dramatically, and TV is so much more than a family of four huddled around a set-top box at 7:59 PM, waiting for their favorite show to be beamed to them.  Viewers are rarely, if ever, consuming TV without some other device on-hand, and have the ability to participate in conversations about and influence their favorite programming like never before.

None of this is news to Mike Proulx of Hill Holliday, who quite literally wrote the book on Social TV.  As Mike tells us in his most recent Spotlight on IMS, social media, the web and mobile devices have all invaded the TV landscape so completely that we need to re-think the way we consider TV itself.  The name may be the same, but for marketers and consumers alike, TV is anything but the same-old traditional media it once was.

YouTube Preview Image

One of the driving forces of change in the TV landscape is Netflix, which is in many ways re-defining the ways that TV viewers take in their favorite shows.  Netflix continues to roll out broadcast-quality shows like House of Cards and Arrested Development , and they do it in a way that seemed unthinkable just a few years ago; they’re releasing the episodes all at once.  Netflix has embraced the brave new world of social TV and jumped in head-first, feeding their subscribers’ desire for binge viewing with no apologies.

By embracing social media and viewer feedback, allowing viewers to watch whenever and wherever they want, without the traditional advertising model getting in the way, all while still creating quality TV content, Netflix is in many ways at the forefront of TV as new media.  In creating their original content, Netflix is able to accomplish many of the tenets of Mike’s WATCH model at a high level. But this new approach for Netflix doesn’t come without any risks.  As The Atlantic points out, their original content approach is a significant financial gamble.

As Netflix creates original content, their own approach to TV will adjust over time as well.  In a recent interview, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings even discussed how Netflix will begin to look more and more like a cable channel over time.  But ultimately, the viewer and his or her devices of choice have the power to dictate in a large way the future of television and of video consumption in general.

Check out the rest of our Spotlight On IMS New York Series, featuring some of the brightest minds from the IMS Community, as we roll them out over the next few weeks leading up to the show.

Want to continue this conversation? Feel free to Tweet to us @IMS_Conference@ThePulse, or join in this conversations with Mike and the rest of the IMS Community using #IMS13

 

Creating Good Content, Talk To Me

This is part three of a five part series between Tyler Pyburn, host at The Pulse Network, and Butch Stearns, Chief Operating Officer at The Pulse Network, as they hash out what goes into creating good content.

 

When creating good content it’s essential to understand the basics of communicating effectively. In order to keep someone’s interest in what you’re saying it’s so important to be conversational. Make the content about them. Communicate in front of a camera or into a microphone the same way you would communicate while having a conversation with your friend. This may seem “easier said than done” for some people, so I’ll break it down for you. Start out with a question to catch your audience’s attention. Make them care about what you’re saying. By starting off with a question, your audience will immediately start thinking about a logical answer, which in fact will make them engaged in your subject matter. Making it about your audience opens that channel of communication, which is a vital part of creating good content.

 

YouTube Preview Image

 

In part four of this series I’ll dive into how to make people care about your content.

Butch Stearns is the COO of The Pulse Network and can be found on his BlogTwitter, and LinkedIn.

Tyler Pyburn is a host at The Pulse Network and can be reached on his twitter or e-mail, tpyburn@thepulsenetwork.com

 

Could Barry Diller be wrong??

“I actually wonder if this post could have been titles – “Is there an opportunity arising that will make someone very rich…”…

But… Bary Diller was quoted as saying -The Internet ‘Absolutely’ Will Become a Paid System’. Time Projection: Within 5 Years” – http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=19552.  And he is not the first to make this statement.  News organizations around the work are grappling with this dilemma – the paradigm has shifted and their businesses and business models are proving to be out of touch and out of date.  Everyone is scrambling to tell us that real content should be paid for and people should pay.  This question is being asked by so many people and so many businesses as they struggle for survival and try to figure out the next generation of news and entertainment.  But will they?  Can you really stem the tide and change the mentality of a consumer who is accustomed to getting free content online?  Or are you just opening a door for new competitors who can think of a reduced cost business model where they can still provide free content and can get reimbursement some other way???

I think there are 2 problems with the idea that content will be paid for.  I wonder which business can be pointed to that provided free access and then successfully made the transition to paid.  I cannot recall one that did it successfully.  The internet mentaility is spilling over now and affecting conferences, magazines, newspapers, and televisions.  And second, even if there were a business model to follow – are you not just opening the door to new competitors who figure out a lower cost model and do not charge for content?  Media companies will argue that their content is superior, that their writers are true journalists and people should pay for that.  But look at the trend in local news stations – the “credible”, “senior” newscasters are being replaced with younger, lower cost newscasters.  Why?  Because credible, while important, is not a deciding factor for the consuming public.  The second issue is timing.  There is a wave of ways to get news now, and that wave is growing.  And to have these “credible sources” and “credible processes” intervening in the distribution of news slows down the process and ultimately causes these “credible sources” to be late to the game.

No question – these sources can and will become opinion pages and opinion sources and some people will be willing to pay for that.  Is that enough to sustain these businesses – I would think not – but we will see.

So go ahead, start charging.  Let’s see what happens and how it plays out.  My opinion – the door is opening for new competitors and soon we will be hearing about news and information sources that we never heard of before, and some entrepreneurial thinkers will become very rich in the process…